That the function of the arts is to teach was an idea almost universally held in Europe before the seventeenth century. According to Indian Poetics, their object Vas considered to be the evocation of trance or, an aesthetic emotion-a thrilling or beatific sensation roused by the appeal of beauty through transport to a different world of pleasure. The French critics of the seventeenth century asserted that pleasure is the end that art strives to communicate, but this is different from the Indian theory.
At that time many critics tried to find moral and intellectual meanings within works of art. Many artists united to defend art, two authors who defend the concept of art are John Ruskin and Oscar Wilde.
In his work From The Stones of Venice, John Ruskin exults and admires gothic architecture because its gives the artist the freedom of creativity and self-expression. The following goes into more detail on the ideas Ruskin and Wilde have on art. In From the Stones of Venice [The Savageness of Gothic Architecture], John Ruskin presents his fondness for Gothic architecture because of the freedom it gives to man, he also points out that he finds southern Europe more appealing than Northern Europe because it is darker.
In the following, Ruskin presents the system of architectural ornaments; in which he particularly prefers revolutionary ornaments because there is no difference between the architect and the workers and so they are all equal.
The following passage presents each system: The systems of architectural ornament, properly so called, might be divided into three: Servile ornament, in which the execution or power of the inferior workman is entirely subjected to the intellect of the higher; 2.
Constitutional ornament, in which the executive inferior power is, to a certain point, emancipated and independent, having a will of its own, yet confessing its inferiority and rendering obedience to higher powers; and 3. Revolutionary ornament, in which no executive inferiority is admitted at all.
Ruskin, John Ruskin goes on to elaborate his favoritism of imperfection.
For Ruskin something that is perfect does not mean that is good and that the search for perfection is weakness and that passion for perfection will lead to the slavery of the mind. Ruskin believes that mental slavery is far worse than physical slavery; for Ruskin gothic ornaments such as gargoyles and goblins are signs of liberty and gives the worker a certain level of independence.
For him, imperfection is far more superior to the quest of perfection. His reasons for loving imperfection, is because nothing in nature or in life is perfect and so art must reflect that.
In this passage, Wilde points out that morality and art are two separate things and they both form a part of the life of the artist; there is no connection between art and moral.
Oscar Wilde believes that the artificial is better than nature because unlike nature that changes and withers, art captures a moment and preserves it. For him, the form is only important and the content does not matter.
Oscar Wilde does not literally mean that art is useless but rather that art is made for admiration and so it must be enjoyed for what it is and not be used to find a deeper meaning. They both rejected the concept that art has to be studied because it holds a deeper moral lesson.
For them, true beauty lies in the imperfection, because in life nothing is truly perfect.
Wilde and Ruskin believe that art is a form of liberation and freedom; for them art is created to be admired and enjoyed.A Literary Analysis of Art For Art's Sake PAGES 3. WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin Sign up to view the complete essay.
Show me the full essay. Show me the full essay. View Full Essay. This is the end of the preview. Sign up to view the rest of the essay. The perfection of a work of art, therefore, depends on the extent to which the formal expression has been able to approximate to the Abstract Idea.
The clearer this image is in the mind of the artist; more satisfactory is its transmission in the work of the work of art. Art for art’s sake, a slogan translated from the French l’art pour l’art, which was coined in the early 19th century by the French philosopher Victor Cousin. The phrase expresses the belief held by many writers and artists, especially those associated with Aestheticism.
Art for Arts' Sake Dear Friends, When I was asked to write to you about my views of the role of the Arts in society, I did not hesitate to embrace the task. Over the past three years, I have been working on a PhD in Music Education.
Read Arts for Arts Sake free essay and over 88, other research documents. Arts for Arts Sake. Art for Arts’ Sake Dear Friends, When I was asked to write to you about my views of the role /5(1).
Get an answer for 'What is meant by the phrase "art for art's sake"?What is meant by the phrase "art for art's sake"?' and find homework help for .
Read Arts for Arts Sake free essay and over 88, other research documents. Arts for Arts Sake. Art for Arts’ Sake Dear Friends, When I was asked to write to you about my views of the role /5(1). "Art for art's sake" is the usual English rendering of a French slogan from the early 19th century, ''l'art pour l'art''. It expresses a philosophy that the intrinsic value of art, and the5/5(1). Get an answer for 'What is meant by the phrase "art for art's sake"?What is meant by the phrase "art for art's sake"?' and find homework help for .